Updated October 1, 2026.
Direct answer: Reinsurance is insurance for insurers: carriers cede premium and loss to reinsurers via treaty programs (automatic) or facultative placements (risk-by-risk), using proportional or non-proportional structures. That backstop drives capacity, attachment points, and renewal pricing that flow through to commercial property buyers.
Why watch this first
The embed walks treaty versus facultative placement, proportional versus non-proportional structures, and why reinsurance sits behind many primary policies. Pair the video with our reinsurance fundamentals for policyholders if you need the cedent-to-policyholder chain in one pass.
What this video covers
The walkthrough covers treaty versus facultative placement, quota share and surplus sharing, and excess-of-loss towers with retentions and limits—a solid baseline before renewal or program design reading.
Key moments
| Time | Topic | What you will learn |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Why insurers buy reinsurance and how cessions flow | |
| Treaty vs facultative | Automatic portfolio covers compared with individual risk submissions | |
| Proportional structures | Quota share and surplus arrangements split premium and loss | |
| Non-proportional covers | Excess of loss, retentions, and limit stacks |
Reinsurance (working definition)
A contract where a reinsurer accepts defined exposure from a ceding insurer in exchange for premium. Treaties run on agreed terms for a class of business; facultative reinsurance is negotiated per risk. Retrocession is the same idea one layer up, when reinsurers cede to other reinsurers or capital markets vehicles.
Key takeaways
- Treaty reinsurance is the default engine for portfolio transfer; facultative fills outliers, large limits, or unusual exposures.
- Quota share and surplus treaties are proportional; excess of loss and aggregate covers are non-proportional and drive cat tower design.
- Retrocession and multi-layer programs spread peak zones so no single balance sheet holds the entire tail.
- Alternative capital, including catastrophe bonds and collateralized reinsurance, now sits beside traditional treaty panels on many programs.
- January 1 and mid-year renewals reprice those layers; cedent retentions and attachment points move when loss years or capacity tighten.
Market context (through mid-2026)
Property cat reinsurance stays selective after heavy loss years, though January 2026 brought steadier pricing on many U.S. regional programs than the 2023–2024 repricing. Reinsurers still tighten aggregate terms and excess layers when severity trends run hot.
Artemis tracked about $17.98 billion of new cat bond and ILS issuance across 83 deals in H1 2026, with outstanding cat bond market size near $65.6 billion at end-June. Sponsors pair that collateralized capacity with traditional treaties; see parametric and index-based risk transfer for trigger mechanics versus indemnity covers.
Lloyd’s, Bermuda, and the January 1 cycle still anchor much U.S. property treaty business—see our global market and January renewal guide. For forms in the video, use the quota share versus excess of loss comparison.
Standards and references
| Source | Use |
|---|---|
| Reinsurance Association of America | Industry advocacy and education on reinsurance practice |
| Artemis.bm | Cat bond issuance and outstanding market tracking (H1 2026) |
| Insurance Information Institute | Plain-language insurance and reinsurance explainers |
Related reading on Risk Coverage Hub
Key terms glossary
Frequently asked questions
Does reinsurance change what my property policy says?
What is the difference between treaty and facultative reinsurance?
How do quota share and excess of loss treaties differ?
What are cat bonds and how do they relate to traditional reinsurance?
Why do January renewals get so much attention?